“Furthermore studies show that the brain operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.”

Then complete the sentence with “Therefore recreational time through the students’ schedule would have detrimental effects.”

Also, not the more vocabulary that is specific.

I’m speaing frankly about “schedule”

This might be good vocabulary because it is vocabulary only pertaining to education or specially related to education.

Therefore it shows the examiner I’ve got rich vocabulary.

“Many people say that globalization additionally the growing wide range of paper writer multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment.”

“to what extent to you agree or disagree.”

“Use specific reasons and examples to guide your position.”

So what’s the crooks of the question?

“That globalization and companies that are multinational damaging the surroundings. Having a bad effect.”

So first: Globalization, definitely damaging the environmental surroundings.

I really could be long. I possibly could give a lengthy and complex, more answer that is accurate that:

“Globalization is increasing the cost of world economic resources that will be therefore enhancing the price of substitute products (or rival products) such as ecological energy from wind farms blah that is… blah, blah…”

However the examiner doesn’t care. Yeah?

He wants to see just something logical.

So I’m just planning to take route that is simple.

Something that is going to be easy to explain and where I’ve got some vocabulary that is good.

Let’s go. This is certainly my idea:

“Increased interaction between countries”

“Leads to improve goods and services traded”

“Which means more production”

“Therefore more resource extraction” (such as for example mining)…

Maybe I’ll remove that in my own final sentence ’cause then i possibly could just talk about the example, which would be:

“For example, in China (largely considered the workshop around the globe), in many cities air pollution masks are expected to commute around the city center.”

So therefore, I’ve proved my point. I said that globalization is damaging environmental surroundings.

Also it’s an easy task to follow.

Next, I need to go back to the question ’cause i desired to check on.

The 2nd point was about multinationals.

Yet again, I’ve taken the simple route. It says,

“Multinationals have the effect of negative effects when you look at the environment.”

It’s quite a statement that is big say that. But I’m just gonna say “yes.”

I’m just likely to say “yes” since it’s simple.

I’m getting points for my language, not for the quality of my ideas.

“Yes, multinationals do increase pollution.”

“Globalization requires global solutions (these could have drastic consequences if accidents happen).”

Of course I’m going to expand it a bit that is little that’s the key element of my argument.

It says, “A negative effect within the environment” when you look at the question.

Here, I’ve put pollution that is“increased more or less is saying.”

I’ve put “destroyed the ecosystem that is local within my example.

In my example, I talk about:

The Gulf Coast Of Florida

The oil pill (a years that are few)

… destroyed the system that is local.

It proves my point.

And them before, I said “drastic consequences” just another collocation there if you’ve caught.

Yet again, get in a solid plan together,

place in down the points,

thinking about a good example that may correspond,

then I’ve got 2 solid paragraphs.

Now, all I have to do is my conclusion and my introduction.

That we can draw from the body paragraphs.

“Parents want to achieve balance between family career but only a manage that is few achieve it.”

“What do you believe is the reason?”

“Discuss possible solutions and provide examples.”

Now, we’ve got the difficulty and a solution that is possible.

So the paragraph that is first be what’s the good reason why there is certainly a challenge trying to find the balance between family and career.

My second paragraph, I will suggest solutions.

This is very important.

I’ve paid attention to your relevant question and every paragraph will correspond

to your question,

towards the components of the question,

structures of the question,

and for that reason I’m going to pick up points for Task Response.

Let’s take a look.

“The first reasons why there clearly was an imbalance…”

Notice as well, I used the negative type of the verb.

It says, “It’s difficult to achieve a balance,” so I said,“The good cause for the imbalance…”

“… is mainly because there’s increased competition within the work place,”

“changes in society,”

“increase into the number of working mothers put strain on the family…”

As you care able to see, I’ve got quite a few points here. Thus I might cut them down and only make use of the ones most strongly related my example.

And my example (once again) is completely invented however it’s believable. Here it is:

“Studies in the United States (US) show that families with two full-time parents are more inclined to separate.”

“Therefore, this shows that locating the balance is incredibly difficult.”

This is why. It’s this that i do believe.

They’re very likely to separate. Full time, a lot of stress, it’s going to be difficult.

Paragraph two, possible solutions.

Possible solutions. Here, I’ve just gone for something that fitted…

I was included with my example first, and then I was thinking “Okay, I am able to go with this route.”

First I was thinking of France having a working week that is 35-hour.

(that will be quite outrageous if you’re coming from the UK and through the United States to even do this.)

(as a result of culture that people have there when you look at the UK).

And so the solution will be:

Regulations through the government.

Government could legislate for increasing maternity leave.

More flexible working practices.

Reduced week that is working.

The government proposed and implemented a 35-hour working week. for instance, “In France”

Also, lot of collocations there.

“flexible working practices”

Make use of these. Once you will get in special vocabulary that you’re only likely to find speaking about this topic.

So we’ve done a questions that are few globalization, also touching in the environment.

We’ve done a few about education.

Now, we’re planning to do one about… Well, a differnt one about equality.

“Nowadays both men and women fork out a lot of money on beauty care. This is not so when you look at the past.”

“What may be the root cause of this behavior?”

“Discuss the causes and possible results.”

Now this 1 was tricky.

This 1 was tricky in my situation because it’s difficult to get the examples relating to this.

Especially for 2 paragraphs.

Okay, it wasn’t difficult. It absolutely was a little more of a challenge and I need to think more.

Nonetheless it’s important that the thinking is done by you process beforehand.

So let’s take a good look at paragraph 1.

You the answers, try and think of some ideas yourself before I tell.

The greater times you will do this,

the greater times you look at a concern

and think of examples,

think about arguments,

the simpler it gets.

Especially in connection with examples.

Especially if you invented the examples.

So my idea was basically marketing.

I’ll give you the relevant question again:

“Nowadays both women and men spend a lot of income on beauty care. It was not so into the past.”

“What could be the real cause for this behavior?”

“Discuss the causes and possible results.”

My idea for paragraph 1:

With this, it’s really simple to consider examples ’cause we have been confronted with publicity everyday.

So it’s not too difficult.

“The beauty market for women may be worth millions, consumer goods companies see similar potential for a man market.”

Once again, just bullet points.

“Therefore developing new ranges, e.g. L’Oreal for Men Expert.”

“Therefore this is because the possibility opportunity.”

“The female marketplace for women is really worth millions.”

“The male marketplace isn’t developed.”

“Therefore developing the male market and we’ve practically doubled our sales.”

So let’s take a good look at some of the collocations.

“consumer goods companies”

And I also may even say, “Consumer goods companies such as L’Oreal, Proctor and Gamble, Johnson and Johnson…”

“see the potential for male market”

For instance, L’Oreal developed a specialist.

If I set up every one of these ideas together in a single cohesive paragraph…

And when you must know just how to write a cohesive paragraph, check out the sentence guide at

For the reason that it offers you just a formula that is really simple used to drop your ideas in and presto.